Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procedural topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Prince George’s County District Council (Feb. 9, 2026)

Prince George's County District Council (sitting as District Council) · February 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Feb. 9 the council approved procedural and review motions including preparation of an approval document for ZMA2024002 (9–0), waiver of review for SE 4848 (9–0), and election to review CSP23002 (9–0); minutes approval was recorded earlier in the meeting with seven members present.

The Prince George’s County District Council recorded the following formal actions on Feb. 9, 2026:

- Approval of district council minutes dated Jan. 26, 2026 — Motion moved by Councilmember Burrows, seconded by Councilmember Adams; roll call recorded ayes from the seven members present at that moment (motion recorded as carried in the minutes).

- ZMA2024002 (The Mark at College Park) — Motion to prepare an approval document for the zoning map amendment, with direction to modify condition language concerning affordable‑student housing consistent with People Zoning Council recommendations; motion moved by Vice Chair Olsen and recorded as passed on roll call, 9–0. The action directed staff to draft materials; no final ordinance adoption was recorded at the meeting.

- SE 4848 (Donald v. Bourgeois Funeral Home) — Motion to waive the council’s election to review the special exception; motion passed on roll call, 9–0 (matter continued to finality per the record).

- CSP23002 (Signature Club East) — Council elected to review the conceptual site plan (motion passed 9–0); council asked the applicant to clarify whether a new purchaser or revised plan is pending following prior remand.

- Adjournment — Motion to adjourn passed unanimously.

Notes

Where the transcript recorded an action but the earlier roll call indicated fewer members present (for example, the minutes approval occurred early with seven members present), the vote tallies in this summary reflect the roll‑call context shown in the transcript at the time of each vote. If the council returns with final ordinance votes on ZMA2024002 or other matters, those final tallies will be reported when available.