Committee adds and backs bill to tighten residential child-care education and practitioner training

General Assembly Committee, Prince George's County · February 10, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee added House Bill 396 to its agenda and moved favorable after presentations and discussion; the bill would require educational supports for children in state-funded residential child-care programs and set minimum training topics for staff certification, and the committee requested inclusion of mental-health training and first aid.

The General Assembly Committee voted Feb. 10 to add House Bill 396 to its agenda and moved a favorable position after hearing a staff presentation and brief discussion.

Teresa Hessler of Ashler Government Relations, appearing for the bill sponsor, said HB396 addresses two policy areas for residential child-care (RCC) settings: educational-support requirements for children ages 5–15 living in state-funded programs and minimum subject areas for residential and youth-care practitioner (RCYCP) training. Hessler said the bill would require teachers to meet with a child’s family at enrollment and allow communication about assignments, behavior and extracurricular activities, and would codify training topics such as child development, special needs and CPR/first aid.

Hessler told the committee that “state fiscal effect is minimal and DHS anticipates a 1 time cost of $25,000” to train staff and update regulations and contracts. Committee members discussed provider concerns that some requirements may overlap with existing regulation; members asked for input from local child-resource stakeholders. Council member Harrison moved a favorable position with an additional clarification to include mental-health training and first aid; the motion was seconded by Sheila Adam Stafford and passed unanimously, 5-0.

Committee members and staff noted the bill is cross-filed in the Senate (SB402) and that sponsors or staff may introduce technical amendments to avoid duplication with current regulations. The committee did not identify a local fiscal effect during the meeting.