Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Projections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District projects $12.8 million increase in state aid, flags pre-K capacity and tax-levy options

Schenectady City School District Board Meeting · February 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District budget presenter Terry told the board state-aid projections increased total aid by about $12.8 million (5.73%), including a projected $1.7 million increase tied to the governor’s proposed universal pre-K plan for 2028–29; staff will return with more detailed enrollment and staffing breakdowns before a final levy decision.

Terry, the district’s budget presenter, reviewed state-aid projections and budget framing under board policy 51 10 and said the district’s total projected state aid rose by about $12.8 million, or 5.73 percent. “Our total aid increased about 12,800,000.0, which is 5.73% of our budget,” Terry said.

Terry highlighted increases to foundation and expense-based aid lines and said the district will closely monitor enrollment to ensure projections are accurate. He noted an estimated $1.7 million increase (about 37 percent) tied to the governor’s proposal for universal full-day slots for 4-year-olds beginning in the 2028–29 school year; the district would receive per-pupil foundation aid for every registered 4-year-old and half that rate for 3-year-olds. Terry cautioned the policy is not mandatory until 2028–29 and that capacity constraints could limit the district’s ability to absorb new slots without facility changes.

Terry gave enrollment and staffing context: the district cited 8,929 in-district students (charter students excluded) and a staff-unit breakdown used to illustrate adults-per-student across bargaining units. He acknowledged the board’s concerns that an aggregate staff-to-student ratio can mask classroom realities, and he committed to provide a more granular breakdown by department, counselor counts, and special-education placements at a future meeting.

On tax levy timing, Terry said the levy submission must be filed by March 1, and the district’s current calculated levy limit is $53,018,450 — an estimated 3.06 percent increase that could generate about $1.6 million in revenue; the board will decide whether to adopt that figure when it finalizes the budget. He noted some pilot and capital payments are falling off the books, which helps keep the proposed levy neutral in later years.

Terry also reviewed capital and facility items (an $850,000 one-time payment for an operations/maintenance building and a separate borrowing proposal of approximately $3.5 million for leased adult-education space) and said the district will present more detailed departmental budgets and employee-position reviews in March.

Board members asked about redistricting timing, BOCES services and costs, UPK capacity and transportation implications. Terry said staff will return with cost breakdowns, service-level detail from BOCES, and scenario work on facility capacity and redistricting.