Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Attorney argues privilege depends on circumstances, cites case reportedly allowing camera review

Forest Hills Local · March 6, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a brief hearing, attorney Justin Whitaker said whether communications between clients and attorneys are privileged depends on the circumstances and cited a case the transcript records as "Ohio 26 14," which he said permitted camera review under certain conditions; no ruling is recorded in the provided transcript.

Justin Whitaker, identifying himself "on behalf of the app lead, Sandy Levy," told the court that the key question was whether communications between clients and attorneys should be treated as privileged "in determining whether communication like clients and attorneys should be afforded both the privilege much often depend on the circumstances of the case." Whitaker argued that the answer turns on the particular facts of each…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans