Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contracting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners vote not to pursue an immigration-related contract after brief discussion
Summary
After discussion that no contract had been formally presented, commissioners debated potential harms and one member moved that the county not pursue a proposed immigration-related contract; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote with at least one dissent.
Commissioners discussed whether to pursue a proposed contract related to immigration enforcement or services and ultimately voted not to pursue it at this time.
The exchange began with a comment that there was no contract in front of the board. Speaker 5 said, "I think at this time... it is not in the best interest of the county to pursue a contract with, immigration," arguing the action could have a negative impact. Another participant urged that Garrett return to the proposer and tell them the county would not move forward rather than wait for a formal contract presentation.
Speaker 5 moved "that we... will not pursue at this time, because of the negative impact it could have on the county," and the motion was seconded. The board took a voice vote; speakers recorded 'Aye' and at least one 'Nay' was heard. The transcript records the voice responses but does not provide a named, numbered roll call tally.
The meeting moved on to adjournment after the vote. The transcript does not record specific contractual details, the identity of the proposed contractor or organization, or any written proposal; commissioners said nothing had been formally presented to them.
