Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission discusses 25-acre exemption, family-division limits and development-rights options

Page County Planning Commission · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed attorney guidance on boundary line adjustments and family divisions, discussed raising post-division retention from 5 to 10 or 15 years, and weighed transfer- and purchase-of-development-rights programs; staff will gather data and consider modest near-term redlines while studying longer-term sliding-scale or PDR/TDR approaches.

During unfinished business, the commission reviewed a legal opinion on boundary line adjustments (BLAs) and family divisions and debated possible amendments to the county's subdivision rules. The county attorney's written guidance (summarized by staff) said BLAs can include clarifying limits (for example, language that a sale or exchange does not create an additional building lot), and state code allows localities to adopt longer retention periods after family divisions (some jurisdictions use 10 or 15 years) to discourage using family divisions to circumvent subdivision requirements.

Commissioners discussed whether family divisions currently cause a material problem in Page County. Staff offered to research historical data (up to 10 years) to determine how many family divisions later transferred to nonfamily owners and whether VDOT entrance requirements affect the practical ability to subdivide. Several commissioners said the number of family-division-derived lots has been small but acknowledged the potential for future misuse.

The commission also examined the 25-acre exemption and how it has been used in combination with other mechanisms (e.g., recording easements) to create parcels that effectively bypass subdivision controls. Commissioners debated whether to keep the 25-acre option on the shelf as an available tool or to modify it — for example, adding a five-year delay on resale or otherwise making it harder to combine the 25-acre exemption with nonfamily divisions.

On transfer and purchase of development rights, staff explained that TDR requires an established tradable development-rights system and receiving areas with utility capacity, which Page County currently lacks. PDR (purchase of development rights) is feasible but requires local funding (potentially with state matching) and a program design; commissioners voiced support for adding a PDR exploration task to the comprehensive plan and forming a subcommittee to research feasibility and examples from neighboring counties. Staff cautioned that administrative capacity and current software upgrades limit how soon a complex sliding-scale or TDR program could be implemented; commissioners agreed to pursue short-term red-line amendments for immediate problems and continue studying long-term programs.