Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teacher Certification topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nebraska senators advance bill to remove state human-relations course requirement for teacher certification

Nebraska Legislature · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of debate, the Legislature advanced LB1022 to E & R initial. Sponsor Senator Merman said the statutory course is an unnecessary barrier for substitute and credential applicants; opponents urged preserving or replacing the requirement with an equivalent, citing classroom management and equity concerns.

The Nebraska Legislature advanced LB1022 to E & R initial on a floor vote after extended debate over whether the state should require a human-relations course for educator certificates and permits. Sponsor Senator Merman said the requirement—codified in statute 79-807—creates an unnecessary barrier for qualified Nebraskans seeking substitute or teaching certificates and overlaps with college coursework.

"If it weren't for the human relations course requirement, that caller could already be in the classroom today," Senator Merman said, arguing the mandate can delay entry by weeks and cost applicants $100–$300. He urged colleagues to eliminate the state-level mandate while preserving local control for school districts that wish to require training.

Opponents including Senator McKinney and Senator Spivey said the training addresses bias, classroom management, and the special challenges of diverse classrooms. Senator McKinney argued that removing the mandate could undermine efforts to reduce suspension disproportionality and to teach basic skills for working with students from varied backgrounds.

"Human relations is of the utmost importance," Senator McKinney said, calling the course foundational to effective teaching and classroom safety.

Several senators proposed alternatives. Senator Spivey and others urged an amendment allowing applicants to demonstrate an equivalent course or relevant experience rather than removing the requirement; Senator Conrad and supporters highlighted LB893 as an alternative that would direct the Nebraska Department of Education to create an accessible, low-cost online human-relations course and test. Senator Merman declined to accept an equivalency amendment on the floor, saying it would reintroduce a barrier.

Supporters of LB1022 emphasized teacher and substitute shortages and the administrative cost and timing hurdles applicants face when taking the community-college courses now listed as acceptable. Senator Hughes described having to enroll in a specific community-college offering and said he did not find the course as useful for substitute teaching as practical classroom-management training.

The body placed the house under call before recording the advancement vote; the transcript records the bill as advancing to E & R initial with a recorded tally in the floor record. Next procedural steps are select-file debate and any committee or floor amendments that may be offered there.

Authorities cited in the floor debate included statute 79-807 (human relations course requirement) and references to existing Department of Education guidance on equivalencies and temporary certificates. The record shows active interest in merging LB1022 with LB893 or adding a demonstrable-equivalency route. If amended on select file, the measure may return to the floor with revised language specifying equivalency, online alternatives, or continued local control provisions.