Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rome board tables $165,000 contract, approves three intermunicipal agreements
Summary
At its Feb. 12 meeting the City of Rome Board of Investment and Contracts tabled a proposed $165,000 contract with Barton and Le Judas, DPC pending review of funding and approved agreements with Darkangelo and Co., LLC and two intermunicipal public-works contracts with Oneida County.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Rome Board of Investment and Contracts on Feb. 12 tabled a proposed contract worth up to $165,000 and approved three other routine agreements.
Minutes of the previous meeting were approved at the start of the session by voice vote. After a brief roll call and a check for communications and public speakers, the board considered its resolutions.
Resolution 34 would have authorized the mayor to enter into an agreement with Barton and Le Judas, DPC for an amount not to exceed $165,000. After the motion to move and second the item, the Treasurer asked that the matter be tabled “to further review where the money is coming from,” and the board voted by voice to table the resolution. No vote tally was recorded in the transcript; the item was set aside for further review.
The board then approved Resolution 35, authorizing the mayor to enter into an agreement with Darkangelo and Co, LLC. That resolution was moved, seconded and carried by voice vote.
Resolutions 36 and 37, each authorizing intermunicipal agreements with the County of Oneida — one for roadside mowing (Resolution 36) and one for roadside ditching (Resolution 37) to be provided by the City of Rome — were moved, seconded and approved by voice vote.
The meeting concluded after a motion to adjourn, which the board approved by voice vote.
The transcript does not record roll-call vote counts for any item; approvals are recorded as voice votes. The Treasurer’s request to table Resolution 34 indicates the board sought clarity on funding sources before committing to the $165,000 contract.

