Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palm Desert council favors clearer "minor/major" framework for historic-property approvals
Summary
City staff told council the certificate of appropriateness code is inconsistent; staff proposed either retaining staff determination with escalation or adopting a clearer minor/major tiered review. Council signaled support for a minor/major approach that reserves only truly major projects for City Council review and streamlines most other applications.
City Development Services staff told the Palm Desert City Council on Aug. 28 that the municipal code governing certificates of appropriateness for historic properties contains inconsistent approval language and that the city needs clearer guidance on who decides modifications to eligible or designated historic resources.
Carlos Flores, Development Services, said the code currently contains conflicting provisions: some sections allow staff approval, others require committee review, and some give final approval authority to a committee (the Cultural Resources Preservation Committee, CRPC) despite earlier changes that removed decision-making authority from committees. Flores presented two options: retain a staff-determination model in which staff could escalate cases to City Council with a CRPC recommendation, or adopt a tiered "minor/major" review that defines scopes of work and routes minor items to staff and major items to City Council with CRPC review.
Council members pressed for clarity on the difference between properties that are "eligible" (from the recent citywide survey) and those that are formally designated; Flores said eligibility and formal designation are different and that designation requires owner agreement. Several council members emphasized that the development community desires certainty and speed in permitting and that a tiered framework could reduce uncertainty by establishing objective criteria up front.
Council also discussed specific examples (including the Desert Magazine building) to test how the code would apply to facade changes or demolitions for properties that are eligible but not formally designated. A councilmember raised property-rights concerns, saying vague historical criteria could delay routine homeowner improvements; Flores replied that staff would reserve the major category for truly consequential projects and aim to streamline minor work.
Where things stand: Staff asked for direction to clean up the code, remove committee final-approval language, and return with an ordinance that either formalizes staff authority with escalation or implements a minor/major tiered review. Council members indicated support for the minor/major approach; Flores said staff will return with proposed ordinance language and criteria for the major/minor distinction.
