Canyon City Schools board votes unanimously to enter executive session for superintendent evaluation

Canyon City Schools Board of Education · February 13, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Canyon City Schools Board of Education voted unanimously Feb. 6 to move into a closed executive session under Colorado law to conduct the superintendent’s evaluation; no public action on the evaluation was recorded and the board adjourned after the closed meeting.

The Canyon City Schools Board of Education voted unanimously Friday to enter an executive session under Colorado law to conduct the superintendent’s evaluation and adjourned after the closed meeting.

Presiding Officer opened the special meeting at 9:04 a.m. and, citing Colorado Revised Statutes section 24-6-402(4)(f), said the board would go into a closed session "to consider a personnel matter specifically to engage in the superintendent's evaluation." A motion and a second were offered, and the board took a roll-call vote that recorded five "ayes."

Board members recorded as voting "aye" were Mister Albright, Mister Alexander, Miss Bridal (the transcript also spells this name later as "Braddy"), Mister Miley and Miss Reeser. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting record does not identify who made the motion or who seconded it.

No public discussion of the superintendent’s evaluation took place on the record. After completing the closed-session activity, the Presiding Officer stated, "with no further business dealing with our executive session, adjourned," and closed the special meeting.

The board’s action invoked Colorado Revised Statutes section 24-6-402(4)(f), which allows local public bodies to meet in executive session to consider personnel matters. The transcript does not record any formal public action on the evaluation itself, and no additional materials, timelines for personnel decisions, or follow-up tasks were specified in the public record.