Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wise County hears strong public opposition to proposed tax rate and recesses to set final rate
Summary
After more than an hour of public comment on reassessment and affordability, the Wise County Board of Supervisors recessed the tax‑rate hearing and agreed to set a later meeting to adopt final rates so residents’ concerns can be considered.
The Wise County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing Feb. 12 on proposed tax rates and heard more than a dozen residents describe hardship from recent reassessments and rising local taxes. After extended testimony the board voted to recess the hearing and schedule a later meeting to set a final tax rate.
Residents at the podium described steep increases in assessments and personal hardship. ‘‘You all have failed us,’’ said Daniel Rollins, who identified himself at the meeting and said the county was ‘‘$8,000,000 in debt’’ and that officials had not acted to prevent the shortfall. Jane Brown, a resident who said she lives on Social Security, described higher taxes on a dilapidated vehicle and the strain of increased levies. Mary Moses urged transparency and asked that large projects not be broken into smaller items to ‘‘hide true cost from the public.’’
Board members acknowledged the public testimony and said they wanted to consider the comments before taking a final vote. The chair announced a motion — seconded and carried — to recess the meeting and set a date, time and place for a follow‑up session to adopt the tax rate. The board also instructed staff to determine logistics for the recessed meeting at the School Board Auditorium and said it would publish the time and date.
Why it matters: Several speakers linked the tax pressure to a county reassessment and to changes in how utility and corporate property are assessed. The transcript record includes a board estimate that a reduction in certain state‑assessed corporate values reduced county revenues by about $1,900,000, a figure cited during the public comment period as part of the case for keeping rates lower. Residents repeatedly urged the board to cut spending and to seek alternatives before adopting a large across‑the‑board rate increase.
What happens next: The board left the hearing open by recessing and said it would pick a date to reconvene specifically to set the tax rate. It also directed staff to include citizen comments in that deliberation. The transcript shows that board members also asked staff to consider targeted relief options such as boosting the elderly and disabled exemption (a separate public hearing was scheduled for March 12).
