Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates pay and experience credits for lateral police hire; chief defends policy to count corrections service
Summary
Cedar City’s police chief defended offering higher starting pay to a lateral hire who has corrections and patrol experience, while the mayor raised concerns about equity with incumbent officers. Council signaled intent to place the wage approval on next week’s consent agenda after staff supplies clearer payroll data.
The council spent an extended portion of its Oct. 8 work meeting on a proposed wage for a recently hired lateral officer, Avery Shumway, and the broader question of how the city counts corrections experience when setting starting pay.
Mayor raised concerns that the proposed starting pay for the lateral hire would place him above several incumbent patrol officers who progressed internally, and said he preferred internal equity and adherence to base pay unless exceptional justification exists.
Chief Darren Adams defended the department’s lateral‑hiring approach: "When we recruit... it's better for the city if we can recruit lateral officers," he said, explaining that the city’s formula counts 2.5% per year of experience and that the department has used corrections experience as part of total law‑enforcement service for several years. He noted that recruiting laterals avoids the roughly $40,000 cost of academy training per new officer and said laterals must still take the same patrol‑level examinations after field training.
Council members asked staff to clarify spreadsheet columns and the basis for the recommended starting salary. Staff said three recent hires (including the officer in question) began work the prior Monday at the salaries entered in payroll; the salary proposed in the council packet was marked as "proposed but not approved." Several council members expressed support for placing the item on consent next week if staff provides full hire‑date, experience and pay documentation so incumbents’ parity can be verified.
The council did not vote to finalize the wage on Oct. 8. Staff said the chief and the city manager have previously approved hires within budgetary authority but requested council oversight on the particular pay level at next week’s meeting.
