Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs deferral agreement for Center Street project with triggers, five-year completion window
Summary
The commission recommended that a developer for the 4200 West and Center Street subdivision be required to construct both sides of Center Street up to 4200 West, with two development triggers and a five-year completion deadline from when the southern trigger begins; engineering staff had urged against deferrals.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After extended discussion about timing and enforceability, the Cedar City Planning Commission recommended that a development-deferral agreement for the 4200 West and Center Street subdivision require road construction on both sides of Center Street up to 4200 West with two triggers and a five-year completion deadline from the first trigger.
Developer Jesse Carter (S11) presented a phase‑1 plan showing the portion of Center Street he proposed to build now (yellow line) and the portion he requested to defer (red line). Carter said his firm would improve the yellow segment immediately and proposed that deferred portions be triggered when the developer works any property south of the red line; he also noted the project includes installing an 8‑inch water line upsized to 12 inches, with the city paying for the upsizing per master-plan requirements.
Commissioners and staff pressed for clear, enforceable triggers and limitations to avoid indefinite deferrals. Engineering staff (Kent, S2) recommended no deferral, arguing the narrow portion is the tightest part of the corridor and should be improved; if any deferral were granted, Kent said it should be limited west of 4200 West and the portion up to 4200 West should be built full width. Commissioners discussed enforcement options — tying obligations to subdivision or building permits, placing time limits, or using liens — and noted subdivision/building triggers are easier to administer.
During the public hearing, resident Tim Heimsoff (S12) testified that he and his neighbors prefer single‑family homes near their property and expressed concern about increased density and changes to neighborhood character. Staff and the developer clarified that the site is zoned R‑3M in parts and that the developer’s initial phase would include small single‑family homes and one twin home.
Commissioner (S10) moved — and Commissioner (S6) seconded — a recommendation requiring the developer to construct the road on both sides up to 4200 West, with the first trigger being development of the south side of the road and a five‑year final completion requirement from when that trigger occurs. The motion passed on a voice vote; two nays were recorded (the project reviewer S8 and Commissioner Mister Decker S9).
Staff said the commission’s recommendation will be prepared for the city council agenda, likely in February, for council consideration and any formal conditions to be finalized.
Next steps: staff will draft the recommended agreement language to delete any phrasing that would undermine the city’s public‑improvement requirements and present the item to city council.

