Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears public concerns as staff proposes allowing compliant locking pool covers instead of fences

Cedar City Council · November 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented a proposal to amend Cedar City Code to permit compliant, locking, weight-bearing pool covers in place of perimeter fencing; a public hearing drew both support and safety concerns about whether covers will be used and enforced. Council put the item on action for follow-up.

City staff opened a public hearing Nov. 19 to consider amending Cedar City Code (packet cites ordinance language as "26-9 4-4-9") to remove the requirement for fencing around private pools when a compliant, locking pool cover is installed.

Staff told council the state has changed its requirements to allow certain covers in lieu of fences. Council members and members of the public asked how enforcement would work and whether individual covers meet accepted safety standards. Councilwoman referenced ASTM F1346 as a recognized safety standard and noted these covers are rated to support 500 pounds; supporters argued that a certified weight-bearing cover provides more reliable protection than a fence that can be climbed.

Opponents raised ordinary-use concerns: if a cover must be closed and locked, will owners remember to close it each time? A public speaker pointed to a recent incident where a small child fell into a backyard water feature and argued constant physical barriers still have value. Planning staff and the speaker from the planning commission said the state’s change leaves limited municipal discretion and recommended the council align local code with state requirements while clarifying enforcement and permitting steps.

What happens next: The public hearing was closed and staff asked to place the item on action so the council can consider specific code language and enforcement mechanisms at a future meeting. Council requested clear standards for acceptable covers, permit and inspection steps, and proposed language reflecting state law.