Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalk Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cedar City council discusses changing sidewalk rules to cut builders’ rework costs
Summary
Councilors, builders and residents debated a proposed ordinance that would shift sidewalk installation from subdivision-stage to building-permit stage to avoid duplicate work and reduce home costs; staff will vet options including curb types and exceptions and return with recommendations.
A debate over when developers must install sidewalks dominated discussion at the Cedar City Council’s Oct. 29 meeting as councilors, builders and residents weighed a petition to move sidewalk requirements from the subdivision stage to the building-permit stage.
Council members and staff discussed complaints that when sidewalks are poured early during subdivision work they are frequently damaged later by home-construction activity, leaving developers to make repairs under existing bonds. "We poured the sidewalk everywhere and then the driveway crews would pour the sidewalk when they're all done," said Phil Schmidt, who described the Echo Subdivision practice and argued a single rule "can't just make one general rule to work for everything." Schmidt said inspectors are thorough and an acceptance letter should validate initial work.
Tyler Melling, identified as an Enoch City resident and developer on a 37-unit project, told the council his team had budgeted roughly $110,000 to pour sidewalks now (about $3,000 per unit) but would prefer ordinance changes so that work is not wasted. "We would still want sidewalks poured along any major rights of way," Melling said, urging the council to consider exceptions for arterials and ADA ramps while shifting some sidewalk installation to a later stage for infill or builder-driven models.
Council members raised tradeoffs: moving sidewalks to the building-permit stage could reduce duplicate work and lower costs for some buyers, but could create ‘‘patchwork’’ blocks where finished homes have sidewalks and adjacent vacant lots do not, creating continuity and pedestrian-safety concerns. One council member said the city already allows roll or modified curbs in some areas, which can reduce driveway cutting and related rework.
Staff outlined the normalization process: a changed approach would follow sketch review, Planning Commission review and a final council decision. Staff also said state law permits waiting until certificate-of-occupancy under an amended ordinance if the council chooses to shift that risk.
Public commenters echoed those themes. Brent Parker warned that long-empty lots leave gaps in sidewalks near mailboxes, and Sean Wharton of 16 Stones Construction described frequent sidewalk damage during building that can make repeated pours necessary. "It's almost impossible to build anything without breaking the sidewalk," Wharton said.
The council did not vote on any ordinance tonight. Members directed staff to study options that preserve sidewalks on major arterials and ADA ramps while exploring models that place sidewalk timing and limited liability differently depending on development type; staff will return with draft ordinance language and implementation options for future review.
