Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Supply topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cedar City councilors agree to up to $12,000 in sewer-lateral work to preserve option to buy nearby well
Summary
After extended debate over a farmer-owned well and the state's protection requirements, councilors authorized up to $12,000 to replace sewer laterals now (to be reimbursed later) so the city can preserve the opportunity to acquire a high-producing nearby well for municipal use.
Council members spent more than an hour on Item 9 — whether to pursue acquisition of a nearby farmer-owned source known in discussion as the Clermont Adams well and whether to pay for immediate protective work so the well could meet municipal standards.
Staff and developers said the well currently produces about 1,200 gallons per minute, has acceptable chemical results and meets several state sealing requirements, but converting it to municipal use would require a state-sanctioned source-protection radius and certain materials or construction standards for sewer laterals in that zone. City engineer Jonathan Stathis said the state's main concern is the sewer laterals and that other items such as parking and irrigation piping were not flagged as barriers by state staff.
Council discussed cost tradeoffs. Staff and the developer (representatives from Velocity Builders) said replacing lateral pipe and related work now while excavation is open would cost roughly $10,000–$12,000; an exact change-order estimate for the laterals was given as $11,759.46. Council members noted additional unknown costs could exist under building footprints if the state requires different materials there and that a formal drawdown test and multiple state approvals would be required before the source could be used municipally.
A motion was made to authorize up to $12,000 to replace the sewer laterals now, with the expectation the city would reimburse that cost later from its exploration/budget adjustment if the acquisition proceeds. The motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. Council members and staff emphasized that this immediate outlay is intended to preserve the short-term acquisition opportunity, since delay could make the well unavailable once neighboring development is finalized.
Council heard additional implementation details: the protection radius likely requires fencing, possible deed restrictions on landscaping within the radius, construction of a pump/chlorination house, easements for pipeline routing, and the need to coordinate with the Water Conservancy District. Staff also said they expect to secure more detailed bids and clarifications on interior plumbing specifications within the next two to three weeks.
Phil Schmidt, who spoke from industry experience, supported the $12,000 risk as small compared with typical exploratory drilling costs. Staff warned the decision carries budget and procedural implications (budget adjustment/public notice if funds are moved from a $4 million exploration fund) and that closed-session discussion would be necessary for price negotiation.
