Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission conditionally backs 'pocket neighborhood' plan at 170 S / 100 W pending development agreement
Summary
Commissioners voted to recommend a change to high‑density residential for a proposed pocket‑neighborhood at 170 S and 100 W, conditioning approval on a development agreement that binds the design, unit count and parking to the submitted rendering and aesthetics.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cedar City Planning Commission gave a positive recommendation for a general‑plan amendment at 170 South and 100 West, conditioned on the applicant and the city executing a development agreement that would lock in the project's aesthetics, unit count and parking commitments.
Scott Higbee, an owner of the lot, described a plan for a pocket neighborhood focused on smaller single‑family detached homes intended for young professionals and university affiliates, not a four‑story multifamily complex. "What we're seeking to do is to put dwellings that are in character with the existing houses in the neighborhood," Higbee said, adding the project would provide two parking spaces per apartment and limit subleasing.
Project representative (Gardner/Ray) showed a rendering and told commissioners the developer would prefer a development agreement to guarantee the design outcome. Staff recommended a development agreement as the only reliable way to hold the applicant to the pocket‑neighborhood concept rather than an unbounded by‑right development under future zoning. "If we want to hold them to this concept and this plan, a development agreement might be a great idea," staff said.
Neighbors voiced both support for revitalization and concerns about parking, preservation of neighborhood character, and long‑term maintenance. Anne Clark asked whether elevations will fit neighborhood character and who will maintain yards; the developer emphasized landscaping choices and maintenance expectations.
Commissioners directed staff to draft development‑agreement language reflecting the submitted rendering, the agreed number of units and aesthetic commitments, and then voted to forward a positive recommendation conditioned on that agreement.
Next steps: staff to prepare a draft development agreement for commission/council review; the item will proceed to City Council with the commission's conditional recommendation.

