Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends general plan, zoning and development agreement changes for Iron Crest area
Summary
The Cedar City Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of general plan amendments, zone changes and an amended development agreement affecting the Iron Crest subdivision and nearby commercial frontage after commissioners debated driveway spacing, a six-foot block wall and shared commercial access on 800 North.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cedar City Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of general plan amendments, zone changes and an amended development agreement covering the Iron Crest subdivision and adjacent commercial area, after commission members debated driveway spacing and buffering along 800 North.
The motion, made by Speaker 2 and seconded by another commissioner, covered multiple general plan density swaps (low-to-medium, low-to-high, medium‑to‑low, medium‑to‑high and high‑to‑medium), the related zone changes and the amended development agreement for the project. The commission approved the motion by voice and directed the recommendation to the city council.
Commissioners and staff framed the discussion around a revised general plan zone-change map to be recorded with the development agreement. Speaker 4 said, “We're getting to the finish line with this project,” and described shifting north–south zone lines and transitions from R1 toward R2/R3 and commercial uses near Lund Highway. Speaker 3 clarified that the currently considered version had been discussed previously but that only part had been published earlier.
A central issue in deliberations was access and safety on 800 North, a master plan road. Commissioners reiterated that residential properties would not be permitted to back out onto 800 North; Speaker 3 stated the commission’s intent "to not have any driveway access at all" for residential frontage on that route. Speaker 5 noted recent additions to the development agreement, including a 300-foot driveway-spacing requirement for commercial access, a six-foot block wall along residential edges, interconnected street standards and provision of park space. Commissioners discussed matching driveways across the street to align access points and suggested shared access arrangements on commercial lots (a 50-foot shared access with 25 feet per lot side) to reduce curb cuts.
City staff (Speaker 6) told the commission the goal was to lay out principles for connectivity, spacing and access rather than fix every driveway location now, giving staff and applicants a framework for later detailed design. Commissioners emphasized avoiding offset or staggered access points between industrial and residential areas, citing safety concerns.
The commission’s positive recommendation advances the proposed general plan amendments, zone changes and development agreement to the next step in the city process; the council packet will include the same version discussed at the meeting. The city council is listed as the next decision point; no date for council action was specified at the meeting.

