Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Closed Session Litigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit committee votes to enter closed session to discuss pending litigation
Summary
At the June 4 meeting the committee voted unanimously to go into closed session to discuss pending litigation; the county attorney was noted to be in court and an advisor (Karen Curtin) was permitted to remain for the session.
During the June 4 meeting a committee member moved to enter closed session to discuss pending litigation and the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.
The committee instructed staff to clear the meeting area and stop live streaming for the closed portion. Members noted the county attorney would not be able to attend because he was in court; the committee agreed that advisor Karen Curtin could remain for the closed session.
The motion to convene the closed session was made, seconded, and approved on voice vote; no substantive details of the litigation were discussed in public session.
The public portion of the meeting concluded after administrative wrap-up and confirmation that there are seven component units.
