Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Milford council weighs updated rules, registration sticker to curb unsafe ATV and golf‑cart use

Milford City Council · February 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilors discussed aligning Milford’s 2007 off‑highway vehicle ordinance with updated Utah state rules, proposed a low‑cost voluntary registration/sticker program for non‑street‑legal vehicles and agreed to coordinate with the sheriff and nearby towns on enforcement and education.

Milford councilors spent a sizable portion of their Feb. 6 meeting debating how to reduce risks from four‑wheelers, side‑by‑sides, golf carts and electric scooters on city streets.

Unidentified Speaker 5 said the city’s ordinance (discussed as "ordinance 8‑2,007, off‑highway vehicles amended 08/07/2007") predates multiple state law changes and may unintentionally grant permissions that conflict with current state standards. He proposed clarifying which streets vehicles may use, aligning local speed limits and distinguishing vehicle classes by state definitions (for example, golf carts that lack odometers/insurance versus side‑by‑sides that may carry license plates).

To increase compliance without outright banning recreational use, the speaker proposed a voluntary safety registration "sticker" program similar to a dog license: owners would register non‑street‑legal vehicles, acknowledge city and state rules, and pay a small fee (suggested $5–$10). The sticker would also create a documented record for enforcement discretion and a modest revenue source that could fund public safety efforts such as helmets or community outreach. "I'm talking like 5 or $10, but it's not about 5 or $10," the speaker said, emphasizing the program’s educational intent.

Council members repeatedly said enforcement is the sticking point: adopting clearer local rules without reliable sheriff’s‑office follow‑through would not meet the council’s safety goals. Several councilors recommended drafting a summary of the ideas and raising them at a county meeting (the council suggested bringing proposals to the 'call' or county meeting that includes neighboring cities) to seek a consistent, countywide approach.

Other measures discussed included focused school outreach, crosswalk improvements already installed near the high school and pilot enforcement with warnings before citations. The council asked staff to draft a summary of proposed ordinance changes and to consult with Beaver and Minersville officials and the county sheriff’s office before returning with recommended language.

Next steps: staff will draft the proposed clarifications, the voluntary registration concept, and follow‑up with the sheriff’s office and neighboring municipalities for a countywide conversation.