Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters raise safety and NIMBY concerns over Garaventa Hills and Town Center redevelopment
Summary
Two public commenters urged caution on the Garaventa Hills housing project — raising emergency access and FPPC complaint concerns — and urged downtown redevelopment for housing, criticizing local opposition as NIMBYism.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During open forum, Greg Scott and Alan Marling told the council about development controversies affecting Livermore.
Greg Scott, a District 2 constituent, criticized the Garaventa Hills project's approval history and raised concerns about emergency access and flood risk tied to historic "category 1" atmospheric rivers. Scott also referenced pending FPPC (Fair Political Practices Commission) complaints against a council member related to the project and called those complaints "specious, fatuous, and ludicrous," urging the councilmember to contest them. Scott suggested using large language models to correlate traffic and economic projections as part of an analytical response.
Alan Marling spoke about a Planning Commission review of a proposed redevelopment of the Town Center shopping plaza near the library, describing residents’ concerns (asbestos, reduced commercial space, parking and traffic) and arguing that opposition amounts to "NIMBYism." Marling named local property owners (Joan Seppala and Jean King) and said he believed their actions had stalled projects such as an Eden Housing proposal downtown.
These remarks were public comments; council members did not take formal action on the matters during the meeting. The council did not respond with substantive factual rebuttal during the session recorded in the transcript.

