Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning panel approves site plan for 7,200 sq ft fireworks store at 2210 Commerce Road
Summary
A local planning panel approved a site plan for a 7,200-square-foot fireworks retail building at 2210 Commerce Road after staff presentation and remarks from applicant Quaid Wafter. The panel recorded the motion as passed; individual votes were not tied to names in the transcript.
A local planning panel voted to approve a site plan for a proposed fireworks retail building at 2210 Commerce Road.
Planning staff presented the application, identifying the owner as "4 e Fireworks LLC" (the transcript also includes the applicant referring to "4 d fireworks"). Staff described a 7,200-square-foot building with about 75 feet of sales floor in front and about 45 feet of storage in back, use of an existing concrete pad for parking, and downward-facing canopy illumination. The submitted plans did not include an engineer stamp, signage, or a finalized landscape plan; staff said an engineer stamp will be added before a permit is issued.
Applicant Quaid Wafter, who spoke for the business, said the building would be an insulated, 16-foot-eave structure with heating and cooling, two furnaces, restrooms and shelving. "It will be fully sprinklered, as is code now," Wafter said, adding that the permanent building would be safer than the temporary tent he presently uses. Wafter also said the back area could be rented short-term for community pop-up uses.
Commissioners and staff discussed safety and regulation. A commissioner asked whether Kansas now allows year‑round fireworks sales; Wafter said the state recently passed legislation allowing year‑round sales but noted that local approval remains required. Planning staff and the applicant said the state fire marshal requires full sprinkler systems in buildings selling fireworks, including protection for canopy areas, and the applicant described a dry canopy sprinkler arrangement intended to avoid freezing in winter.
After discussion, a motion to approve the site plan (listed in the meeting packet as 2025‑0501) was made and seconded. The transcript records three commissioners saying "aye" and one saying "nay;" the chair declared the motion passed. The transcript does not identify which commissioners cast which votes.
Next steps: staff said the missing engineer stamp and any administrative items would be completed before permit issuance. No hearing date or permit timeline was recorded in the transcript.
