Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Bylaw topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeville planning board approves preliminary stormwater bylaw draft, sends to conservation and health
Summary
The planning board approved a trimmed draft stormwater management bylaw and voted to circulate it, with an accompanying memo, to the conservation commission, board of health, select board and other departments for comment; staff will prepare rules and regulations if the bylaw proceeds to town meeting.
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Bylaw topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lakeville Planning Board on Feb. 12 approved a preliminary redlined stormwater management bylaw and directed staff to circulate the draft, with a memo addressing prior conservation comments, to the conservation commission, board of health, select board and relevant departments.
Planning staff and Stephanie Crampton described edits that reduced the draft bylaw from roughly 16 to 12 pages while preserving key protections. Crampton recommended clarifying definitions (for example, distinguishing terms that are used interchangeably in the draft) and assigning a single stormwater permitting authority to the planning board while allowing the board to coordinate with conservation on wetlands-related matters. She said rules and regulations would be drafted to capture procedural detail removed from the bylaw text.
Board members discussed exemptions for agricultural activity, how the bylaw would intersect with MS4 permit requirements, and the need for peer review of technical materials such as revised stormwater reports. The board agreed the bylaw should apply townwide for disturbances that meet the trigger (for example, one acre of disturbance), noting that local rules can require operation and maintenance provisions even where MS4 areas exist.
A motion to approve the preliminary draft and to circulate it, along with a responsive memo for conservation, passed unanimously. The board modified the motion to circulate the draft beyond conservation so that other departments and boards (including board of health and select board) can provide comments before the draft is finalized for town meeting. Staff were asked to return with any conservation feedback and to coordinate peer review where required.

