Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Watershed Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Emery County ratifies letter to NRCS seeking PL‑566 flood-control classification for Jones Valley project
Summary
The commission ratified a previously sent letter asking NRCS to treat the Jones Valley/Cottonwood Creek project as PL‑566 flood control, keeping federal cost-share terms close to the original intent and moving the planning package to national review.
Get email alerts on the Watershed Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ratified a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service asking that the Jones Valley/Cottonwood Creek Watershed Plan be considered under PL‑566 flood-control criteria rather than an alternative funding classification.
County staff and Jay, the county project lead, reviewed the project’s history: initial planning began in 2018 with flood-control intent and included catch basins and debris-control structures above Orangeville and at Seeley Creek and Larry Water. Staff said the NRCS had re-classified part of the project and proposed a 65/35 cost-share (county share 35%), which would significantly change local financial exposure. The ratification letter argued the original intent and NRCS rules should support flood-control classification and a higher federal share; NRCS responded and moved the project back to a flood-control review and national review process.
Public and partner comments came from Emery Water Conservancy District and a Forest Service representative who urged attention to scenic integrity, maintenance burdens for catchment basins, impacts on fish passage (bluehead sucker), and the need for ongoing maintenance arrangements. A county official estimated $4–5 million already invested in planning. Commissioners noted that if planning proceeds favorably, project authorization still requires congressional or federal approval.
Why it matters: The project aims to protect the county’s reservoir and water supply from post-fire sedimentation and debris; preserving federal cost-share terms would reduce local capital exposure. Maintenance responsibility and scenic/biological impacts remain unresolved and will be part of the national-review comment process.
What’s next: Planning is nearing national review; county and partners will monitor NRCS comments and congressional authorization processes.
