Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Inkster council approves appointments and passes resolutions on voting access and officer identification
Summary
The council approved a consent agenda, multiple board appointments and two resolutions — one opposing documentary proof-of-citizenship ballot proposals and another supporting bills to unmask certain law-enforcement agents — all passed by voice votes; several appointments to pension, board of review, parks and other commissions were confirmed.
Get email alerts on the Council Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its meeting, the Inkster City Council approved the consent agenda, confirmed multiple appointments to boards and commissions, and passed two resolutions concerning voting-access and law-enforcement transparency.
On the consent agenda and a series of appointments, the council voted to approve: Connie Mitchell to the pension board; reappointments and appointments to the police and fire retirement trustees and board of review including Corey Snyder, William Miller, Leonora Womack (alternate), Peggy Bishop Lucas and Ernestine Williams; Judy Street was reappointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission; and Chief Jenkins was nominated to the beautification committee. Motions to appoint and reappoint were moved, seconded and approved by voice vote; the transcript records the council saying "aye" and declaring each motion passed without recording a numerical roll-call in the public transcript.
On policy resolutions, the council approved a resolution opposing proposed ballot initiatives that would require documentary proof of citizenship and modify voting access standards in Michigan. The council also approved a separate resolution described in the meeting as supporting proposed state measures to "unmask" certain law-enforcement officers, particularly agents associated with federal immigration enforcement. Both measures were moved and seconded and carried by voice vote.
No formal amendments, budgetary impacts or implementation timelines for either resolution were recorded in the meeting transcript; the motions were adopted as council positions. The council did not record a roll-call tally in the public transcript sections provided here; each item was finalized by the chair's declaration that the motion 'passes.'

