Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oil And Gas Theft topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears industry, law enforcement backing for harsher penalties on oilfield theft; substitute fails to advance on tie vote
Summary
Proponents including industry groups and law enforcement urged passage of a substitute for SB 221 that would add organized-theft and racketeering tools for oil- and gas-related theft; the committee ultimately recorded a tie on final action, and the bill did not continue.
A committee substitute for SB 221 (House bill 221), proposing increased criminal penalties and the addition of specific oilfield misappropriation offenses and racketeering tools, drew extensive testimony from industry leaders and law enforcement but did not advance after a tie vote.
Steven Robertson of the Permian Basin Petroleum Association described organized theft of fuel and equipment in the field and said stolen copper wiring and tampered monitoring systems pose environmental and public-safety risks. Special counsel Sean Sullivan, speaking for the Attorney General's office, told senators that fuel theft can fund criminal organizations and that the pattern of organized activity differentiates those crimes from ordinary larceny.
Law enforcement witnesses described incidents in which thieves compromised grounding wire and other infrastructure, creating significant safety hazards and environmental contamination. Industry witnesses from Armstrong Energy Corporation, Mack Energy, and Marion Oil and Gas said frequent thefts of copper, batteries and even pumps disrupt operations, endanger workers, and impose costs on small operators.
Some committee members questioned whether existing larceny and environmental statutes already criminalize these acts and whether increasing penalties for a specific industry is proportionate. Proponents argued the aggregate public-safety and environmental harms, and the organized nature of the crimes, justify industry-specific penalties and racketeering provisions.
At the end of debate the committee took a motion recorded as a 'do not pass' on SB 221 with a do-pass for the judiciary committee substitute; the roll call resulted in a tie, and the chair stated that on a tie vote the bill does not continue. Senate Judiciary recessed.
