Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Consultants outline master facilities plan options for Oak Park D97; board asks for process map and community engagement

Oak Park Elementary School District 97 Board of Education · August 14, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

STR/SDR consultants proposed a master facilities plan with added sustainability, safety/security, educational enhancements and a facility condition survey at a cost range of $182,250–$247,250; the board requested a clear process map, stakeholder engagement timeline and cost-prioritization options.

The Oak Park Elementary School District 97 Board on Aug. 13 received a proposal to update its master facilities plan—the first comprehensive update since about 2015. Jennifer (STR/SDR) and district facilities staff described a four-component approach that includes a facility condition assessment, safety and security audit, sustainability alignment and educational enhancement analysis.

Scope and cost. The consultant said the new plan expands prior scopes and outlined a cost range of $182,250–$247,250 (up from approximately $152,000 for the prior plan), noting the range depends on parameters for the safety/security audit and the sustainability work. The plan would include building walk-throughs, capacity and space-utilization studies, stakeholder surveys and a prioritization framework for phased capital work.

Board feedback and process requests. Trustees asked for clarity on who will participate in walk-throughs, how students and building leaders will be engaged, and where the plan will document maintenance and outcomes from the referendum-era projects. Board members asked the consultants to return with a visual process map, an engagement timeline, options by cost and a communications plan to solicit meaningful community input (including how to prepare students and parents to give informed feedback).

What’s next: Consultants said they will refine the scope and return with a proposed plan that maps engagement points, cost options and a schedule for FACT and board review.