Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff urges update to impact‑fee study; board to ask council for funding for third‑party review
Summary
Staff told the Laconia Planning Board the current impact‑fee schedule is based on a 2009 assessment and that the city currently collects 50% of the assessed fees; the board directed staff to request City Council funding for a third‑party update and asked for clearer, consistent waiver standards.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Department told the board that Laconia’s impact‑fee schedule relies on a 2009 assessment and that City Council increased the collection rate to 50% of the assessed total in 2021. Staff noted the ordinance requires a review of those values and recommended seeking a modern analysis.
“Even if we just left it at, we're only collecting 50% of the total impact that developments have on the community, that would still increase a significant amount just by inflation alone,” the assistant planner told the board while showing a CPI‑adjusted comparison.
Staff outlined that the current fee schedule covers capital categories allowed by state statute — schools, police, fire, recreation, roads and library — and that an updated study could account for inflation, demographic change and potential additions such as water and sewer where authorized. The current single‑family fee cited on staff materials is $7,629.61 in total assessed impact, of which the city collects half under current policy.
Board members urged consistency when granting fee waivers and asked staff to return with a recommendation and with cost estimates for hiring an independent consultant. Planning staff said they will request City Council funding to engage a third party, bring cost estimates at the next council meeting, and come back to the board with a plan to update the schedule before the ordinance review deadline in mid‑2025.

