Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer says Copperview Plaza’s Building 7 will be a single‑tenant restaurant; council asked for alignment

Herriman City Council · June 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers updated the Herriman City Council on Building 7 at Copperview Plaza, saying they plan an 8,000‑square‑foot single‑tenant restaurant and are in active discussions with a tenant identified as "Dally's, Soup and Salad." Staff told the council the proposed use is allowed in the current zoning and sought alignment before permitting.

Developer representatives updated the Herriman City Council on June 11 about changes to Building 7 at Copperview Plaza, telling the council they plan to make the back building a one‑story, single‑tenant restaurant.

Unidentified Speaker (S11), representing the development team, said the building will be "8,000 square feet dedicated to single tenant restaurant use" and that the team is "in active conversations with a restaurant called Dally's, Soup and Salad." The presenter said Colliers had not been successful in finding an entertainment tenant and that market conditions — including a nearby small entertainment venue — prompted the change.

Planning staff clarified that the restaurant use fits within the site's NBA zoning and that a restaurant meets the percentage requirement the code documents require; staff described the item as an update rather than a zoning change. Chris, a member of the development team, walked the council through design considerations and how service areas and deliveries will be screened from view to reduce impacts on adjacent tenancies.

Council members generally responded positively to the change, noting resident interest in sit‑down dining in the area and the project’s visual compatibility with the existing buildings. The developer estimated construction wrapping up in January–February of next year if permits and tenant agreements proceed.

The council did not take a formal vote at the work meeting; staff said they would proceed with the building‑permit process and return with any required permit materials or requests to modify entitlements. The presentation sought only confirmation that the council was aligned with the developer’s approach.

Questions remaining for the council and staff include final tenant lease terms, any required parking or service‑area adjustments, and the timing of permits and tenant build‑out.

The developer presentation began as agenda item 2.2 and concluded before the council moved to the next agenda topic.