Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grant Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance committee affirms existing grant application controls, asks board to 'study and support' process
Summary
After hearing staff explain federal and private grant procedures (policies 0108, 0301, 0606), the committee voted to recommend the board study and support the current grant application and acceptance process, while asking staff to clarify timing language for short‑window opportunities.
The Finance Committee recommended that the full Utah State Board of Education study and support the agency’s current internal grant application and acceptance process, including written internal controls designed to ensure board notification and attorney‑general review where required.
Grants compliance officer Sarah Harward/Harvard reviewed three internal policies (0108 grant management, 0301 pre‑award process and 0606 procurement), described the Federal Funds Request Summary (FFRS) procedure for recurring federal funds, and explained impact categories that determine approval steps: low impact (<$1M/year), medium impact ($1M–$10M/year), and high impact (>$10M/year). She said staff aim to place grant application notices on the board consent calendar when timing allows and that high‑impact awards require legislative approval.
Board members raised concerns about narrow application windows that sometimes require staff to apply before the board can meet. Deputy Superintendent Jones and staff emphasized that the current internal controls permit staff to apply in time‑sensitive situations but require board notice and ultimate board approval before accepting awards not already appropriated. Member Randy Booth moved that the committee recommend the board “study and support the current grant application process.” The motion was approved by the committee unanimously.
What happens next: the committee’s recommendation will be transmitted to the full board; staff said they will codify wording clarifications (for example, explicit consent‑calendar notice language when time allows) and continue training staff on the procedures described in policy.
