Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
USBE finance committee backs phased fix to charter SPED funding, forwards R277-479 to full board
Summary
The Utah State Board of Education Finance Committee voted to forward draft rule R277-479, which phases down disproportionate special-education weighting for certain charter schools and applies caps to all charters, recommending a multi-year phase-in to balance fiscal and student impacts.
Get email alerts on the Special Education Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah State Board of Education Finance Committee voted to send draft rule R277-479 to the full board after agreeing to recommend a phased approach that would reduce unusually high special‑education weighting for some charter schools.
Chair Cindy Davis said the committee needed to act to bring charter funding “in line with our own legalities” while protecting students. Dale Frost, the board’s minimum school program administrator, told members the draft will extend caps that previously applied only to new and expanding charter schools and correct a feature of the prior-year ADM methodology that allowed some charters’ SPED WPUs to grow out of proportion to their actual student counts. “There was no true up, and that’s the problem with the prior year plus,” Frost said, describing how the growth formula had effectively double‑counted students during expansions.
Frost presented scenarios A–H for implementing the change, from immediate implementation to multi‑year phase‑ins, and highlighted tradeoffs: faster fixes would save more state dollars quickly but could force program cuts or layoffs at small LEAs; slower phase‑ins would soften impacts on individual schools but delay budgetary savings. The staff recommended a two‑to‑four‑year phase‑in as a pragmatic balance. Frost also described a technical correction: a figure previously read as “14%” in the draft should be 1.4% (0.014) and staff will correct that language in a subsequent draft.
Board members pressed on student impacts, fiscal signaling to the legislature, and legal constraints such as maintenance‑of‑effort (MOE). Member Randy Booth asked how eliminating a SPED position at a small charter would affect student services; Frost said impacts would vary school by school and that LEAs would still be legally required to meet IEP requirements, though they might meet them by reallocating general‑education resources rather than one‑to‑one aides.
After debate, the committee moved to adopt option E, a middle‑path phase‑in scenario, and Chair Davis moved the formal action that the committee approve R277‑479 (funding for charter students with disabilities on an IEP), draft 1 as amended on first reading, and forward it to the full board for second and final reading. The chair announced the motion passed unanimously with one member absent.
What happens next: the rule now goes to the full Utah State Board of Education for consideration on second and final reading; staff will correct the 1.4% language and provide revised drafts and fiscal models requested by members. The committee also discussed scheduling additional briefings so board members can review the scenario spreadsheets in depth before the board meeting.

