Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff brief council on Lakeview Parkway annexation; staff says annexation shifts future decisions to city
Summary
City staff presented a briefing on a proposed annexation of about 38.79 acres along Lakeview Parkway, clarified county zoning (RA‑5), explained that annexation would move future development decisions to Provo City while any rezone or development would still be subject to rezone processes and federal wetland mitigation rules enforced by the Army Corps of Engineers.
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff briefed the council on a proposed annexation of roughly 38.79 acres in Provo’s eastern annexation area (Lakeview Parkway). Staff emphasized this is a jurisdictional decision — bringing parcels into the city would not automatically authorize development but would shift the decision‑making venue from county to city and allow the public to participate in future rezoning or development reviews.
Staff told the council the parcels are currently zoned RA‑5 in the county. There had been public confusion that the parcels were unbuildable wetlands; staff said that while portions are designated wetland, the county zoning includes development rights that bringing the land into the city could place into a more conservation‑oriented city zone. Staff emphasized the Army Corps of Engineers and federal rules control wetland designation and mitigation requirements, not the city.
Councilors asked clarifying questions about conservation options, the Army Corps’ mitigation process, and whether an annexation agreement similar to other annexations could be used; staff said conservation easements, future rezone hearings and neighborhood input would be part of any subsequent process. Staff said the annexation matter would return for further questions and be on the evening agenda for formal consideration.
Ending: Staff said they would return to the council in the evening meeting with a formal annexation ordinance, and follow‑up questions could be directed to staff present at the work session.

