Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Herriman council authorizes schematic design work for public works facility; staff to limit scope to available funding
Summary
Council approved moving item 11.2 off the consent agenda and authorized staff to proceed with schematic/programming work for a proposed public works facility at Butterfield Park/Teton Ranch, with staff instructed to constrain design to the council's available funding (staff cited a $12 million CIP placeholder and an $80,000 schematic fee).
The Herriman City Council on Feb. 26 voted to remove item 11.2 from the consent agenda and to authorize schematic and programming work toward a new public works facility at Butterfield Park/Teton Ranch, with staff directed to proceed within explicit budget constraints.
Nathan, a city staff member covering the item, said earlier plans for a public works facility had been too ambitious for the proposed site near homes and that staff now prefer a constrained approach: "This time we're gonna tell them, this is how much money we have," Nathan said, describing an intent to give designers clear budget limits rather than produce an unaffordable program. Nathan said a $12,000,000 figure is still programmed in the capital-improvement plan from earlier planning but was entered before a recent re‑examination of scope and site. The staff presentation noted that prior programming assumed larger build-out populations and that the new schematic work will prioritize essential functions and phased construction where appropriate.
Councilmembers questioned how constraints would be applied. One councilmember said the goal should be a realistic plan rather than "a lost dump of money into some fantasy that never materializes." Staff responded that the design procurement stage will include explicit constraints, periodic council checkpoints and the option not to proceed to later, costlier phases until council authorizes them.
During discussion staff said an $80,000 schematic/programming contract award was the intended early step to get realistic cost estimates; the council moved and unanimously approved item 11.2 as written. The item had been pulled from the consent agenda to allow discussion of scope and cost-containment measures.
City staff said future CIP conversations will further refine the project's budget and sequencing. The council did not set a final construction budget at the meeting and directed staff to return with further details before advancing to construction phases.
