Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utility Rates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Infrastructure committee advances consumption-weighted utility rate plan to City Council

Topeka City Infrastructure Committee · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Topeka infrastructure committee voted to forward a consumption-weighted rate option ("Option 2") to the full City Council for an ordinance before rates take effect Jan. 1, 2026. The change would shift the base charge to active accounts and apply smaller consumption charges, with a modest average-bill increase for typical users.

At its Nov. 18, 2025 meeting the Topeka Infrastructure Committee voted to send a consumption-weighted utilities rate proposal—referred to by staff as Option 2—to the full City Council for consideration ahead of a Jan. 1, 2026 rate change.

Sylvia Davis, director of the Utilities Department, told the committee the department had already trimmed an earlier package, reducing a proposed overall increase from about 9.85% to 7.75% across water, wastewater and stormwater by cutting operating expenditures "by over 2%" and other savings. Davis said the department examined several approaches to the so-called readiness-to-serve charge and that removing readiness-to-serve for inactive accounts would reduce annual water revenue by roughly $528,000 and wastewater revenue by roughly $457,000.

Davis outlined three main options: a flat base charge applied equally across meter sizes, a consumption-weighted adjustment (Option 2) that places a small additional per-unit charge on consumption, and a prorated adjustment that varies by meter size. Using the department's illustrative averages, Davis said Option 1 would raise an average customer's monthly combined bill by about $1.52, while Option 2 would produce a smaller change (the department's illustrative average customer moved from about $84 to $84.57 under Option 2). Davis also noted the department's customer-portal functionality to check meter usage is in beta and staff can supply usage reports on request.

Councilman Neil Dobler said Option 2 "seems a little bit more fair to folks that don't use a lot of water" and moved to forward that option to the governing body; the motion was seconded and approved by the committee. Dobler and other members emphasized the committee must weigh trade-offs: shifting readiness-to-serve revenue off inactive accounts reduces annual revenue that now helps finance the water-assistance program and capital work, and staff said the gap would need to be covered either by budget cuts, drawing on assistance funds or reduced capital spending.

The committee's vote sends Option 2 to the full City Council for ordinance drafting and final action. According to Davis, staff said they need roughly two weeks of lead time to implement any change so billing will reflect the council's direction before the rates that take effect on Jan. 1, 2026 go live.

Next procedural step: the Utilities Department will present the ordinance and supporting numbers to the full Topeka City Council; the committee did not set a final effective date beyond the Jan. 1, 2026 schedule already on the department's calendar.