Lawmakers question Teach for America funding over DEI concerns; TFA Appalachia defends classroom results
Loading...
Summary
Advocates urged withholding TFA funding because of concerns about DEI influence in training materials; Teach for America Appalachia leaders and local supporters cited retention and principal satisfaction data and asked lawmakers to weigh classroom outcomes when deciding on the $700,000 line item.
At the subcommittee’s fifth meeting, critics and supporters of Teach for America (TFA) debated whether the legislature should continue a recurring appropriation for the organization.
Andrew McNeil and Richard Nelson, representing Kentucky Free and the Commonwealth Policy Center, said the budgeted $700,000 per fiscal year included in House Bill 500 should be withheld until lawmakers determine whether Teach for America continues to embed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) concepts in its training. Nelson summarized TFA’s historical use of DEI language in organizational materials and cited reporting that the organization had changed public language on equity and altered a senior job title; he said the legislature should consider redirecting funding directly to school districts if it removes TFA from the budget.
Teach for America Appalachia’s executive director, CD Morton, and colleagues defended the program’s local impact. Morton described TFA as a national teacher‑preparation and leadership program that places "core members" (classroom teachers) in rural Eastern Kentucky districts. He said the region has received more than 325 placements since 2011, currently has roughly 30 active core members in specified counties and that survey data show high local support: "94% of our principals that are surveyed, say that the core members either meet or exceed the expectations for learning outcomes," Morton said. He also described program supports, including a Mountain Teacher Fellowship that aims to continue professional support into years three through five.
A lawmaker asked whether the $700,000 appropriation supplements district payroll and pressed for an accounting showing how the funds are spent; TFA representatives said the allocation supports training, ongoing fellowship supports and system‑level activities and asked lawmakers to consider both per‑teacher support and broader program investments. Supporters from Eastern Kentucky, including a former state auditor and local education leaders, told the subcommittee they had seen positive student results and urged continued funding because TFA helps fill hard‑to‑staff positions in rural schools.
No formal vote on TFA funding was taken at the meeting; the subcommittee lacked a quorum at the start and proceeded with presentations and questioning. Lawmakers requested further documentation on retention rates, vacancy counts and a detailed breakdown of how the appropriation is used before taking budget action.
What happens next: Subcommittee members asked TFA to provide more detailed financial and retention data; any final appropriations decisions will occur in later budget deliberations.
