Kansas Senate passes bill tightening at‑risk funding rules after heated debate
Loading...
Summary
The Kansas Senate approved SB 387 after lengthy floor debate over requiring written proof of household income for at‑risk funding and giving the Legislature a role when districts opt into the federal Community Eligibility Provision. Opponents warned of costs and federal compliance risks.
TOPEKA — The Kansas Senate narrowly approved Senate Bill 387 on Feb. 11 after several hours of debate over changes to how the state identifies students eligible for 'at‑risk' education funding.
Senator Shane (R–Miami County), the bill’s sponsor, told colleagues the measure responds to a 2025 legislative post audit that found the state’s current proxy — the National School Lunch Program free or reduced‑price lunch count — can be a poor measure of need. “This bill will not take a single lunch from a single Kansas child,” Shane said, arguing the proposal separates state school funding determinations from federal meal verification and would reimburse reduced‑price co‑pays for qualifying students.
The bill requires written evidence of gross household income for students who apply through the income application process before they may be counted as at‑risk under the Kansas School Equity and Enhancement Act. It exempts students who directly certify for free lunch through programs such as Medicaid, SNAP or child welfare, Shane said, and includes a contested provision that would require legislative authorization before a local school or district may participate in the federal Community Eligibility Provision (CEP).
Opponents warned the measure would impose substantial administrative costs on school districts, risk federal funding and raise constitutional questions. Senator Hoelscher (R–Johnson County) said testimony from districts estimated verification could cost millions and thousands of staff hours, and warned the proposal could make it harder for hungry children to access meals. Senator Miller (D–Wyandotte) argued the bill could conflict with federal school lunch verification rules, risking up to $250 million in federal funding for school meals.
Several amendments were offered. Senator Clays (R–Sedgwick County) proposed an amendment directing a post‑audit study of alternative metrics and including a reporting deadline; that amendment failed on a voice vote after disagreement about embedding the requirement in statute. Another amendment from Clays to remove the CEP legislative‑approval requirement failed as well. Shane said the bill attempts to protect state taxpayers by making the state’s at‑risk count more accurate and that the language was drafted to avoid altering federal verification requirements for the National School Lunch Program.
Floor votes recorded the committee report as adopted and, later in final action, the Senate passed SB 387 by a recorded vote of 22 in favor and 18 opposed. Senate leaders advanced SB 387 with several other bills under an emergency suspension of rules for final action.
Supporters said the bill aims to reduce misallocation of roughly half a billion dollars distributed through the at‑risk formula and to direct possible savings to other educational priorities. Critics urged patience, a formal fiscal note, and more study to avoid unintended consequences for districts and students.
The bill’s next step is enrollment and transmittal to the governor. The Senate action follows an intense floor debate that emphasized the tradeoffs between fiscal accountability and the practical burdens on schools and families.
