Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shawnee Heights board pulls KASB 'controversial issues' policy (IKB) for more review amid debate over bullying language
Summary
The Shawnee Heights Board approved a package of KASB policy updates but pulled the controversial-issues policy (IKB) for further questions. Members debated parental opt-out rules, whether to retain references to gender identity and sexual orientation in bullying language, and the risk of outside legal review.
The Shawnee Heights Board of Education approved a set of policy updates recommended by the Kansas Association of School Boards (KASB) but voted to remove policy IKB, on controversial issues, from the approval package for further review and questions.
Board member Christie Vanmeter moved approval of the KASB updates excluding IKB; Buck Reuter seconded and the motion carried 6-0. The board’s discussion that preceded the vote focused on parental opt-out procedures for planned classroom discussions, how spontaneous classroom discourse should be treated, and whether to retain specific protected categories in the bullying policy.
KASB’s recommended language and the district’s practice drew specific attention. A district presenter summarized KASB’s position and the practical opt-out approach; the transcript records that "KASB's recommendation ... aligned with recent legislative actions removing DEI related terminology, following the charge of the US Department of Ed" (speaker identified in the transcript as the KASB/district representative). Another board member cautioned that keeping certain language could "potentially draw review from the attorney general's office, the US Department of Ed, or the Department of Justice." (direct summary of remarks in meeting notes).
Board member Lauren Teismiller and others pressed for clarity on implementation. One board member said they had "a lot of heartburn" about adopting KASB’s proposed wording because of the potential chilling effect on organic classroom discussions and concern that the district could over-correct in response to legal risk. Questions included whether planned classroom discussions would be treated differently than spontaneous discussions, how opt-outs would be recorded, and whether a centralized form at enrollment would be appropriate.
On bullying policy language, the board debated whether to keep explicit references to "gender identity and expression" and "sexual orientation" and whether to remove the phrase "cultural awareness." Some members favored retaining explicit categories to ensure protections for groups that may be disproportionately bullied; others expressed concern that such wording could invite outside review or conflict with recent executive/legislative guidance.
Next steps: IKB will return for further information and written questions from board members before a future vote. The superintendent and district attorney recommendations will inform the revised draft and the board expects to discuss the item at a subsequent meeting.
