House committee debates redesign of pretrial supervision and $200,000 proposal for DOC pretrial staff
Loading...
Summary
The committee discussed a proposed redesign of the pretrial supervision program that would target a narrow high-risk group, expand accountability dockets and wraparound services, and considered the governor's proposal of $200,000 to add seven DOC pretrial positions.
The House Corrections and Institutions Committee spent a large portion of its Feb. 17 hearing on a planned redesign of pretrial supervision and related corrections appropriations.
Committee Chair said the pretrial supervision program "is gonna be taking a different direction," describing a proposal to focus supervision on a narrow group of high-risk defendants while using accountability dockets and community-based wraparound services for others. Chair emphasized participation would be voluntary in the current model but said the redesign is intended to expand who can access supervised services rather than detaining people who otherwise would be released.
The committee reviewed budget figures and staffing questions tied to the redesign. The governor proposed an additional $200,000 "to go towards, 7 permanent PMP officers," according to the transcript; committee members questioned whether $200,000 would sufficiently fund seven positions and noted existing appropriations already include roughly $1.2 million for pretrial supervision and an additional cited amount (fiscal-year appropriation lines were discussed in committee). Members raised operational questions about whether DOC could assign officers to accountability-docket days in courthouses, whether courts outside Burlington would run accountability dockets and whether positions are available in HR's vacancy pool to be repurposed.
Lawmakers pressed for details before committing to new spending: they asked DOC and judiciary to clarify the number and location of dockets that would use a DOC presence, how risk assessment would be performed at arraignment, and whether wraparound services already being provided would make supervision unnecessary in many cases. Committee staff said a new draft of statutory language would be produced and DOC would be invited to testify to clarify how many positions are needed and whether existing appropriations could be redirected.
No formal decision or vote on the proposed $200,000 or statutory changes was recorded at the hearing. Committee members indicated they expect continued deliberations with DOC, judiciary and appropriations staff in the coming weeks as they prepare capital and corrections bill markup.
