Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Leadership topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Cheryl Cullors elected chair; Tony Carter chosen vice chair at Warren County Board annual meeting

Warren County Board of Supervisors · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its annual meeting the Warren County Board of Supervisors elected Cheryl Cullors as chair and Tony Carter as vice chair, approved a minor agenda reordering to let public comment occur earlier, and opened a broad public-comment period focused largely on Samuels Public Library.

Cheryl Cullors was elected chair of the Warren County Board of Supervisors for 2026 and Tony Carter was selected vice chair at the special annual meeting called by County Administrator Brad Gotchell.

Gotchell opened nominations for chair; Supervisors nominated Cheryl Cullors, Tony Carter and Roger Bienchini. After roll‑call indications of preferences, the board confirmed Cullors as chair. Later Henry nominated Carter for vice chair; the roll call returned unanimous 'Aye' indications and the board concluded its officer selections for 2026.

The board also agreed to a procedural change to the agenda that moved the public-comment period ahead of several policy items so residents could speak on non-public‑hearing agenda items. The swap was approved on roll call.

The meeting then opened a 30‑minute, three‑minutes‑per‑speaker public-comment block. Many of the speakers used that time to urge the board to restore funding to Samuels Public Library and to disband the Warren County Library Board; several also voiced concerns about meeting procedures and transparency. County Administrator Brad Gotchell and supervisors acknowledged the volume of public interest and the board moved on to policy discussions and other business after comments concluded.

The board did not adopt any substantive policy changes as part of the officer elections; the meeting proceeded to a substantial debate over meeting procedures and a later, separate vote on a legal‑transparency resolution.