VHCB outlines housing pipeline, conservation work and readiness to deploy capital if appropriated

Vermont House Committee on Commerce & Economic Development · February 18, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Vermont Housing & Conservation Board briefed the committee on housing, conservation, and REDI grant-writing work; VHCB supports the governor's property transfer tax recommendation and highlighted projects converting vacant schools to apartments and investments that yield long-term permanent affordability.

Gus Selig, executive director of the Vermont Housing & Conservation Board, and Liz Gleason, director of the farm and forest viability program, presented an overview of VHCB’s work and budget priorities. Selig described recent projects — converting vacant school buildings to mixed housing, new rental and homeownership projects, and investments in shelter capacity and recovery residences — and noted VHCB’s statutory charge to ensure permanent affordability.

Budget context: Selig said VHCB supports the governor’s property transfer tax recommendation (roughly $37.6 million in testimony) and described how the agency leverages public dollars. He reported that average VHCB investment across a range of activities is about $80,000 per unit when averaged across project types, but that new construction or substantial rehab can cost far more. He also noted the board’s historically strong leverage: targeted investments can protect long‑term affordability and limit future subsidy needs.

Conservation and farm/forest programs: Gleason outlined farm and forest viability and the Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI), which funds grant writers and technical assistance; she said REDI’s work (estimated state spending of roughly $1.2M since 2017) has helped communities secure about $35.5M in external grant funds. VHCB emphasized collaboration with regional partners and complementary roles with Working Lands and agency programs.

Why it matters: VHCB framed investments as a way to preserve permanent affordability, steward working lands and conservation values, and catalyze community economic activity. The committee did not take formal votes; members asked about statutory allocations from the property transfer tax and VHCB’s prior-year funding patterns.