Citizen Portal

Board approves Union Pines synthetic turf funding as booster groups pledge $90,000; controversy surfaces over IT building site

Moore County Schools Board of Education · February 10, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board authorized $663,100 from restricted Fund 8 to complete Union Pines High School's synthetic turf installation (FieldTurf), with boosters pledging $90,000 for the upgraded 'cool play' infill; separately, the board endorsed requesting lottery funds for a new IT/PAR building on the Bass Carthage parcel, prompting debate over community opposition and site suitability.

Moore County Schools' board members approved design services and a funding plan Feb. 9 to install synthetic turf at Union Pines High School and also discussed a separate plan to seek lottery funds for an IT/PAR building on district-owned land that prompted public concern.

Miss Purvis presented a history of the turf project and the district's funding: the county commissioners previously approved $600,000 (bond interest), and a Convention Visitors Bureau grant contributed $120,000, leaving a remaining balance. FieldTurf proposed two systems; the recommended 'cool play' infill is an estimated $1,383,100 total cost but costs about $89,700 more than the Pinecrest spec. Union Pines band boosters pledged $10,000 and the athletic boosters $80,000 to pay the incremental $90,000, so the board approved a $663,100 draw from Fund 8 restricted revenue to complete the project, with the district to invoice booster groups for their pledged amounts after construction. Miss Davis abstained from the vote.

Separately, the board endorsed requesting $3.3M in capital lottery funds for a new IT/PAR design-build project estimated at $3.3M that staff proposed to site on the Bass Carthage parcel the district owns. Multiple board members raised public-opinion and process concerns about placing an institutional/warehouse-type facility on a rural parcel that some citizens opposed for a planned elementary school; staff noted the site is zoned for school-related supplemental buildings and that geotech testing was completed. The board voted to request lottery funding; several members said the county CVB could and should be urged to direct more tourism-related revenue toward school athletics and facilities.

Board members asked staff to ensure Fund 8 expenditures do not supplant security/SRO resources and to invoice boosters as pledged. Staff also reiterated that Fund 8 is restricted revenue and the Fund 8 draw is one-time and will not change ongoing SRO funding streams.