Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing And Community Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves $9,363 CDBG shift to preserve building at 44 South Saint Mary Street

Saint Marys City Council · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a revision to the 2024 CDBG allocation to move $9,363 from a Russell Street demolition/clearance project to a historic-preservation project at 44 South Saint Mary Street after bids for the preservation work exceeded the original request.

Saint Marys City Council approved a requested revision to its 2024 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocations to cover higher-than-expected bids for a historic-preservation project at 44 South Saint Mary Street.

City staff explained that bids for work at 44 South Saint Mary Street, described in the meeting as the old Fleming/Brasel funeral building (also referred to as the fashion building), came in higher than anticipated. Manager Matt asked to reallocate $9,363 from the Russell Street clearance and demolition project to cover the shortfall for the historic-preservation work. Staff said the demolition project remains funded and that the CDBG program can place a lien on privately owned properties that accept funding; council and members discussed lien terms and whether projects could be sold within a five-year lien period.

Council members asked whether the recipient property owners could cover the overage themselves and whether reallocating funds would stall other projects; staff said they would contact property owners to discuss options and could pursue alternative CDBG projects that have excess funds if needed. After questions about ownership and project status, council moved to approve the reallocation and the motion carried.

Council directed staff to return if further reallocations or clarifications are needed. No precise revised project schedule or additional funding sources were specified at the meeting.