Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the License Plate Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill to end eight-year plate replacement cycle fails after concerns about numbering, design and implementation
Summary
Senate File 112, which would have eliminated the statewide eight-year plate replacement cycle and allowed residents to keep plate numbers/series indefinitely, failed in committee on a 2-3 vote. Supporters cited cost savings; opponents raised concerns about numbering capacity, law-enforcement readability and lack of statutory clarity.
CHEYENNE — The committee rejected Senate File 112, which would eliminate the current eight-year statewide license plate replacement cycle and let residents retain plate numbers and backgrounds indefinitely, after members and county treasurers raised implementation and enforcement concerns.
Sen. Kolb, sponsor of the bill, said the measure would stop mass replacement cycles and let people keep plates they like. "This will get us out of this endless cycle of having to replace all the plates," he said, adding the legislation would allow people to replace damaged or unreadable plates for a fee.
Deputy Director Taylor Rossetti raised technical and operational issues, including how duplicate numbers across plate series would be managed, retroreflectivity/readability for law enforcement, and the mechanics of production if the state shifts from mass production to on-demand printing. "If this bill were to go through, I think that sets that onto the back burner... it gives us some time to contemplate that," Rossetti said, but he highlighted unresolved implementation questions.
County treasurers told the committee they had not reached consensus. Lindsay West said some treasurers worry that the bill lacks statutory clarity about numbering capacity, whether county prefixes would be retained and how preferred low numbers would be preserved or changed in future design shifts.
Committee debate reflected those concerns. Several members defended low-number plate traditions; others said the bill's language leaves too many operational questions unanswered. The roll-call vote returned two ayes and three nos, and the bill failed to advance out of committee.
Committee adjourned after concluding business for the day.
