Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves law letting counties tie permitting to contractor wage compliance
Summary
HB 16‑60 HD1 passed the committee after supporters argued county labor standards will deter wage theft and level the playing field; proponents stressed the measure is discretionary for counties and not intended to delay affordable housing, though members asked for guardrails to avoid unintended subsidy loss.
The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce on Feb. 12 voted to pass HB 16‑60 HD1, which would authorize counties to require contractors to disclose wages, benefits, hours and employment status and allow counties, under specified conditions, to deny, revoke or suspend building permits for violations of wage‑and‑hour laws.
Supporters including the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations and union representatives said the bill ties compliance to permitting to deter fraud and misclassification. Mark Anthony Clemente of the Hawaii Regional Council of Carpenters testified the measure “simply ties compliance to the permitting process [and] reinforces laws already on the books,” adding that following the law should not be a competitive disadvantage for responsible owners.
Andrew Pereira of Pacific Resource Partnership cited a joint investigation that led to nearly $700,000 in U.S. Department of Labor fines and said cheating contractors often forgo paying federal and state employment taxes, which harms public services funded by those revenues. Pereira argued county authority would help “catch these cheating contractors in the future and keep these bad actors out of Hawaii.”
Concerns and safeguards: Several members raised concerns that tying permit revocation to wage violations could slow affordable‑housing projects and jeopardize federal subsidies. Testifiers and DLIR representatives repeatedly emphasized the bill grants counties discretionary authority — it does not force automatic permit pulls — and that counties would need administrative structures and rules to implement any compliance checks.
Committee action: The chair recommended passage as introduced and the committee adopted the recommendation.
Next steps: The committee passed HB 16‑60 HD1. Members requested further work on implementation details and emphasized county discretion and coordination with affordable‑housing programs to avoid unintended consequences.
