Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City reports pavement condition index of 75; officials urge preservation over 'worst-first' fixes

Hagerstown City Council · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The city's 2025 pavement-condition survey found an overall PCI of 75 (satisfactory). Staff urged a pavement-preservation strategy (mill-and-overlay, crack filling, slurry) and warned that cuts to highway-user revenue would degrade the index over time; a three-year paving list will return to council in March.

HAGERSTOWN — City public-works staff updated the council on the 2025 pavement-condition survey and recommended a pavement-preservation strategy to extend the life of streets and reduce longer-term reconstruction costs.

The specialized survey van collected pavement defect data citywide and produced a pavement-condition index (PCI). Staff reported an overall city PCI of 75, which falls in the "satisfactory" range (55–85) and is above some peer municipalities. Public-works staff explained common preservation techniques — mill-and-overlay (typical two inches off and two inches on), crack filling and slurry seals — and said a focus on timely preservation across the system yields more value than a strict 'worst-first' approach.

Staff flagged the South End (Chestnut Street, Rosehill Avenue and nearby blocks) as an area needing focused overlays. They also warned that sustained cuts to highway-user revenue, the city's primary pavement-preservation funding source, could lower the PCI substantially over a decade: if funding were cut in half for multiple years, models predict the city's PCI could fall below 70.

Officials said they will return to council in March with a three-year overlay list based on the survey results and recommended priority areas. The council discussed potential county or state funding partnerships but noted that counties also rely on highway-user revenue and have larger road networks to maintain.

No formal vote was taken; the survey serves as a planning tool for upcoming budget and pavement lists.