Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Probation Termination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judge Boyd grants early termination of probation in State v. Julian Juarez
Summary
The court granted the defense’s motion for early termination of probation in DC 2022 CR 10228 (State v. Julian Juarez) after probation confirmed completion of all conditions and the complainant stated she did not oppose; the court emphasized the no‑contact restriction remains and noted unrelated family‑violence matters were not before the court.
SAN ANTONIO — In DC 2022 CR 10228 (State v. Julian Juarez), the 187th District Court granted the defense’s motion for early termination of probation after probation confirmed that the defendant had completed required parenting classes, community service and paid supervision fees, court costs and fines.
Probation told the court the defendant “has completed everything” required under supervision. The state advised the court that while the complainant was not opposed to early termination, the prosecutor had concerns about four outstanding family‑violence‑related matters that appeared on other dockets; the court noted there were no revocation motions filed and that the unrelated matters were not before the court.
Judge Stephanie Boyd granted early termination of probation on the record but stressed that the no‑contact condition with the complainant continues. “You’re not to have any contact with her,” the judge told the defendant, reiterating the ongoing restriction even after the termination of probation.
The court made a formal notation that the defendant had been on probation since April 11, 2023, and that probation had twice previously denied early termination because earlier petitions were filed before sufficient time had elapsed or because of prior concerns (including testing issues that had since been addressed). The court said the present record supported granting the request because the supervised‑release conditions had been satisfied and the complainant did not object.
Next steps: The court entered the order granting early termination on the record; any related pending charges not before the court were left for those respective dockets.
