Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adaptive Reuse topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers propose boutique hotel and events campus at Riverview; staff says plan ‘overwhelms’ historic site and requires multiple approvals
Summary
A development team proposed adaptively reusing the 15‑acre Riverview estate as a boutique hotel and event venue with a campus of low‑scale buildings. Staff and several commissioners said the proposal currently conflicts with Franklin Road historic‑district goals and the Envision Franklin plan and urged smaller scale, clearer buffering, and adherence to accessory structure guidance; the applicant will refine the plan before pursuing formal amendments.
Greg Gamble and his development team presented a conceptual plan to adaptively reuse the Riverview Historic Estate — a 15‑acre National Register property on Franklin Road — as a boutique hotel, restaurant, spa and event venue. The team said the main house would be preserved and new, lower‑profile accessory structures would be placed away from Franklin Road, stepped into the hillside, and screened with landscape buffers.
Staff cautioned that the proposal would require an Envision Franklin plan amendment, a preliminary Historic Zoning Commission recommendation, rezoning and site plan approval and a Certificate of Appropriateness. Staff said the proposal, as presented, “overwhelms the site's historic buildings and meets none of these guidelines” (staff comment) and noted Envision Franklin principles generally recommend no further development on the property because prior infill established the site and setting. Staff also noted limits on accessory structures (they should be subordinate to the principal building and located behind its plane) and that the proposed massing and number of new buildings exceed guidance for the site.
Commissioners expressed appreciation for the preservation intent but questioned scale, parking, visibility from Franklin Road, potential floodplain impacts for parking locations, and the number of new accessory buildings relative to the site’s historic layout. Several commissioners urged the team to provide comparisons to successful cases that preserve the principal building prominence and to show how the proposed massing would be subordinate and well shielded from public view. The applicant said the design team had intentionally broken massing into smaller volumes, planned to tuck parking into grade and behind landscape, and would continue refining the plan with additional context studies and community outreach.
Staff said the project has generated emails and phone calls and that public comment would be included in future HZC materials should an application proceed. The DRC did not approve the concept and advised the applicant to focus on making the new work accessory in scale and visibility to the principal historic resources before seeking formal amendments.
