Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mission Cigar team proposes covered patio; staff flags 50% footprint cap and material concerns

Franklin City Design Review Committee (subcommittee of the Historic Zoning Commission) · February 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Applicant Aaron Rogers (906 Studio) and owner JT McCroft proposed a 985 sq ft covered patio at 121 3rd Avenue North. Staff noted the accessory structure would be 50.9% of the principal building footprint and recommended reducing the footprint below 50% and replacing unsupported translucent panels with historically compatible roofing.

Aaron Rogers of 906 Studio and JT McCroft, owner of Mission Cigar, presented a plan to roof an existing rear patio at 121 3rd Avenue North to make the space usable in inclement weather.

Staff explained the accessory structure’s proposed footprint is 985 square feet compared with the principal building’s footprint of 1,934 square feet, which yields roughly 50.9% (the guidelines recommend accessory structures not exceed 50% of the principal footprint). Staff also identified translucent polycarbonate panels as a material not supported by the design guidelines.

Commissioners and staff recommended simplifying the roof truss detail, considering asphalt shingle to match the principal building and removing translucent panels; the applicant said they were open to an asphalt shingle option and were concerned about noise and natural light needs in the covered space. Commissioners suggested design options to reduce the effective footprint (pulling a roofline back or eliminating overhangs) and asked whether skylights or later roll‑down screens would be appropriate; staff said skylights on accessory structures are uncommon and suggested checking interior standards.

The DRC did not issue a final determination; staff asked for revised plans, material samples and a clearer demonstration that the accessory footprint would meet guidelines.