Lewiston council approves six-month moratorium on lot-rent increases in mobile‑home parks
Loading...
Summary
Facing testimony from dozens of mobile‑home residents about double‑digit lot‑rent hikes after out‑of‑state purchases, the council approved a moratorium on lot‑rent increases (first passage) to give the city time to study permanent protections; vote 6–1.
The Lewiston City Council voted to approve first passage of a moratorium ordinance that would pause lot-rent increases for mobile‑home park lots while the council studies longer-term protections. The vote on the first reading passed 6–1.
Councilors and dozens of residents described recent sales of parks to out‑of‑state investors followed by rapid rent increases that many occupants—often seniors on fixed incomes—say they cannot afford. Residents from Fox Run, Country Lane, Stetson Brook and other parks told the council they had seen increases of 10%–33% in a single year, loss of community maintenance and few protections when ownership changes hands.
Councilor Herrmann, who had requested the agenda item, said the pattern of out-of-state purchases and rapid increases is the primary driver of the problem; she asked whether a retroactive clause was needed. City staff and councilors noted state law (chapter 399) requires a minimum 90‑day notice before a lot-rent increase becomes effective, which constrains local retroactivity and reduces the immediate need for retro language.
Public testimony was heavy and emotional. Mobile-home residents described saving by owning their homes but renting the land, being unable to move a home affordably, and facing sharply rising lot rents after new corporate ownership. Several speakers urged the council to include enforcement mechanisms and to pursue options that protect long-term residents.
Council debate included concerns about investor response and long-term supply effects; some councilors warned a moratorium targeted only at mobile-home parks could chill investment or shift pressure to other housing markets. Supporters said the moratorium is a temporary tool to buy time while the city assembles policy options, housing-committee recommendations and legal review.
The council passed the measure on first passage with a 6–1 roll-call vote and will continue the public hearing and consider permanent language in coming meetings.