Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ice Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Butler County commissioners to reconsider ICE contract, cite alleged jail mistreatment
Summary
Multiple residents used the public-comment period to urge the Board of Commissioners to suspend or end the county�s contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, citing alleged poor conditions and systemic abuses in local jail facilities and calling for the county to use its administrative authority to protect residents and detainees.
Butler County residents pressed the Board of Commissioners on Feb. 3 to re-examine the county�s contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and to investigate alleged mistreatment at county jail facilities.
At the public-comment portion of the meeting, Linda Spurrier of Hamilton asked whether non-criminal migrants apprehended in nearby counties would be detained at Butler County facilities and urged county officials to inspect sheriff-owned facilities unannounced. �Can you go there as county officials unannounced?� she asked, adding concern about reports that people in custody were being left �cold and hungry without access to adequate sanitation or to legal assistance and phone calls to family.�
Ann Brown of Hamilton presented a written piece titled �Sheriff Richard Jones cruel and unusual punishment,� telling commissioners that inmates lack interpreters, receive only thin blankets and no pillows, endure 24/7 fluorescent lighting, cold showers and high commissary prices. �So please read this and please talk to the sheriff about it,� she said.
Several other speakers challenged the county�s continued participation in an ICE contract. Maisha Mahmood of Fairfield Township said counties around the country are exiting ICE agreements because of documented harms and that �ending a risk filled contract is not a political statement. It is governance.� Ellen Price of Oxford referenced a U.S. government analysis she said shows immigrant offending rates lower than native-born rates and urged the board not to conflate immigration with crime.
Commissioners opened the period for comments under established rules and did not deliberate during the public-comment portion, as announced at the start of the session. There was no formal motion or vote on terminating or amending the ICE contract during the meeting.
What happens next: commissioners did not take action on the contract at the Feb. 3 meeting. Public speakers asked staff and elected officials to investigate conditions, and urged direct engagement with the Sheriff�s Office; no formal request from the Board to the Sheriff was recorded during the meeting.
